mercredi 6 mai 2015

In Transit: A Place for Breast-Feeding Mothers at New York Area Airports


Pumping and nursing pods will be available at Kennedy Airport, La Guardia Airport and Newark Liberty International Airport.


Source: New York Times


    



In Transit: A Place for Breast-Feeding Mothers at New York Area Airports

Collected Department Releases: The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Announces Final Selections for Worldwide Architecture and Engineering Support Services


The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Announces Final Selections for Worldwide Architecture and Engineering Support Services




Media Note


Office of the Spokesperson



Washington, DC


May 6, 2015




The Department of State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) announces the final selection of design and engineering teams for the worldwide Architecture/Engineering (A/E) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Support Services contract.


The final firms selectedare:



  • AECOM



  • Caples Jefferson Architects



  • Davis Brody Bond



  • EYP, Inc.



  • Jacobs Government Services



  • Moore Ruble Yudell Architects/Planners


They will support the Department’s planning, construction, and facility rehabilitation efforts at U.S. missions worldwide.


Since 1999, as part of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program, OBO has completed 121 new diplomatic facilities and has an additional 39 projects in design or under construction.


OBO’s mission is to provide safe, secure, and functional facilities that represent the U.S. Government to the host nation and support our staff in the achievement of U.S. foreign policy objectives. These facilities should represent American values and the best in American architecture, engineering, technology, sustainability, art, culture, and construction execution.


For further information, please contact Christine Foushee at FousheeCT@state.gov or (703) 875-4131, or visit www.state.gov/obo.






The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.



Source: Dept. Of State – Releases


    



Collected Department Releases: The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Announces Final Selections for Worldwide Architecture and Engineering Support Services

Business Travel: Business Travelers Want to Be Left to Their Own Devices

By JAD MOUAWAD


Smartphones have already transformed vacation planning, but business travelers looking to use Uber, Airbnb and other tech tools find they must take on sometimes unyielding corporate travel policies.


Source: New York Times


    



Business Travel: Business Travelers Want to Be Left to Their Own Devices

Q&A: Ian Schrager Unveils the New York Edition

By JULIE EARLE-LEVINE The hotelier’s newest property opens in the landmark Metropolitan Life Tower on Madison Avenue on May 11.


Source: New York Times


    



Q&A: Ian Schrager Unveils the New York Edition

Daily Press Briefings : Daily Press Briefing - May 6, 2015

Share


Jeff Rathke


Acting Deputy Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing

Washington, DC


May 6, 2015







TRANSCRIPT:






11:59 a.m. EDT


MR RATHKE: Good morning.


QUESTION: Good morning.


QUESTION: Afternoon.


MR RATHKE: I don’t know. We may need to synchronize our watches, Matt.


I just have two things to mention at the start. First of all, the Secretary is on his way to Riyadh right now. This morning he traveled from Nairobi to Djibouti, where he held a bilateral meeting with President Guelleh and a press availability with Foreign Minister Youssouf. The Secretary also participated in a youth engagement event at a mosque, where a group of Djibouti young men and women talked about their efforts to combat violent extremism. And finally, he participated in a consular event at our Embassy in Djibouti, where he personally provided consular services to American citizens and their family members who have fled Yemen for Djibouti. He also did a tour of Camp Lemonnier and a town hall event with U.S. military personnel stationed there.


And the second item before we get started, Nepal, a brief update. Yesterday, an Air Force contingency response group arrived in Nepal to work with the USAID Disaster Assistance Response Team and the Government of Nepal to improve efficiency at the international airport. The CRG will help streamline airfield operations and speed up cargo flow so that relief supplies can be delivered more quickly to places in need. Also yesterday, May 5th, the U.S. military deployed one additional helicopter to Nepal, bringing total U.S. military air assets to four V-22 Ospreys and two UH-1 Huey helicopters.


And with that, Matt, we will turn it over to you.


QUESTION: I just have one very brief one. It’s a follow-up from yesterday, and it’s just to find out if you have decided that you have an opinion one way or the other on the Omar Khadr case, which we – was delayed yesterday.


MR RATHKE: Right. So on that case, we are aware that the Government of Canada is appealing the Canadian court’s April decision to grant bail. Our line remains the same as yesterday: We refer you to the Government of Canada to comment on the decision that will be made by Canadian courts. We, of course, have a strong and cooperative relationship with the Government of Canada on security and law enforcement issues, but I don’t have a comment to make on the case that’s before the Canadian courts.


QUESTION: Okay. But I just want to make sure you understand the question. I am not asking for the Canadian –


MR RATHKE: Right.


QUESTION: — version of – for the Canadians’ opinion on this. I’m asking for the U.S. opinion on this, to which – are you suggesting that I ask the Canadians to find out what the U.S. position is on this?


MR RATHKE: Well, I’m simply saying that we respect the independent processes of the Canadian judiciary, and we respect Canada’s sovereignty. I’m not going to make a comment about the case that’s before the Canadian courts.


QUESTION: Does that mean that you’re okay with anything that the court decides? Because there are many cases in many countries where you’re not okay with what a court decides.


MR RATHKE: I simply have nothing further to offer on this one.


QUESTION: All right.


MR RATHKE: Okay.


QUESTION: That’s it for me.


MR RATHKE: That’s it from you. Okay.


Other topics? Please.


QUESTION: My name is Hillery Gallasch. I’m with ARD German Television.


MR RATHKE: Yes.


QUESTION: I have a question in regards to – the German administration is under fire right now, being pushed to release lists of search terms that were apparently given to the German intel service by the NSA. They’re playing on time, saying there are negotiations with the United States on what to release and not release. Is the United States blocking or working with the Germans trying to block any release of search terms given to them?


MR RATHKE: Well, I’d make two comments in response. The first one is that we work closely with Germany on all matters of international concern and we value Germany’s engagement on the entire range of global issues. But the second point is we don’t comment on intelligence matters, and I’m not going to comment from this podium on that.


QUESTION: Has Germany approached you in any way?


MR RATHKE: Again, I’m not going to offer a comment on that.


New topic? Michel.


QUESTION: Yemen. Do you have any update from Aden, especially that the Houthis are on the offense now and the news reports talk about having 42 civilians died?


MR RATHKE: Well, first thing I’d mention with respect to Yemen, I think you probably have seen a couple of fact sheets that we released this morning. One is about the additional humanitarian funding that the Secretary announced today when he was in Djibouti. And the second was about our services to American citizens, so just to bring those to your attention.


With respect to the situation on the ground, I don’t have a battlefield update. Our position remains, as it has been for quite some time, that we call on the Houthis to cease their unilateral military aggression and to find a way back to the negotiating table, but I don’t have a – I’m not going to confirm those details that you’ve referred to.


QUESTION: Will the Secretary meet with the Yemeni president in Riyadh?


MR RATHKE: I don’t have a schedule update to announce for the Secretary in Riyadh. I expect later today or tomorrow morning we’ll have a fuller list of his activities, but the schedule’s still coming together, so I don’t have anything to share right now.


QUESTION: Thanks.


MR RATHKE: Yes, Taurean.


QUESTION: I have one on Russia’s Victory Day parade.


MR RATHKE: Okay.


QUESTION: So the North Korean Government announced on Monday that Kim Jong-un would not be attending that parade and instead would send its nominal head of state. Do you make anything of that seemingly reversal by the Kim Jong-un regime?


MR RATHKE: I’m not going to try to interpret that decision. I don’t have any comment to offer on it.


QUESTION: And then on – the Chinese media also reports that its honor guard will participate in the Victory Day parade. Do you have any comments to say on that?


MR RATHKE: No, I don’t have a comment on China’s participation.


QUESTION: No particular concerns or –


MR RATHKE: No. I think we’ve spoken about our representation there. We are – will be represented at the military parade by Ambassador Tefft, and that’s the nature of our participation.


QUESTION: Jeff.


MR RATHKE: Yes.


QUESTION: On Syria, Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah has said yesterday that if Assad falls, Hizballah falls. Do you have any reaction to that?


MR RATHKE: Not a specific one. I’m not going to respond to all of Nasrallah’s comments. We’ve been clear that Assad has no future and no legitimacy inside Syria. We also have spoken out repeatedly against the destabilizing role that Hizballah has played, which has to stop. But I don’t have a specific comment for (inaudible).


QUESTION: Will you help in this case in the fall of Assad?


MR RATHKE: I think our policy, again, is quite clear. We, on the one hand, support the Syrian people and the Syrian opposition. We do that in a variety of ways. And of course, we also support the Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura, who right now is in Geneva having consultations with all relevant parties about finding a way to implement the Geneva principles.


QUESTION: And any date for Special Envoy Rubinstein, Rubinstein’s meeting with de Mistura?


MR RATHKE: Well, the consultations have just gotten underway this week. So the U.S. is participating in these UN-led consultations, and the U.S. – from our side, our Special Envoy Daniel Rubinstein will attend, but I don’t have a date to announce for his participation in the consultations.


QUESTION: Thank you.


MR RATHKE: Yes.


QUESTION: Hello, my name is Grigory Dubovitsky. I’m from Russian Information Agency RIA Novosti. So do you have any updates on Secretary Kerry’s schedule next week, and can you confirm information about upcoming meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov in Sochi on May 11th?


MR RATHKE: No, I don’t have any schedule announcements to make for the Secretary.


QUESTION: Thank you.


(The briefing was concluded at 12:10 p.m.)






The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.



Source: Dept. Of State – Briefs


    



Daily Press Briefings : Daily Press Briefing - May 6, 2015

Collected Department Releases: Keynote Remarks at the Bioeconomy and Climate Change Forum


Keynote Remarks at the Bioeconomy and Climate Change Forum




Remarks


Charles H. Rivkin
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs



Washington, DC


May 6, 2015




As prepared


Thank you, Eric, for that introduction.


Good morning everyone, and a special welcome to our ambassadors and others from the foreign diplomatic corps here today.


Before I continue, I’d like to thank the many people responsible for today’s event, including our partner, the Biotechnology Industry Organization, or BIO. I look forward to hearing from Jim Greenwood, President and CEO, in just a few minutes.


I also want to thank all the people in the State Department who worked on this event for their outstanding support and participation in making this event happen. That includes, in particular, the Foreign Service Institute, as well as the Office of Global Food Security, the Office of the Science and Technology Advisor, the Bureau of Oceans, Environment, and Scientific Affairs, and of course our own Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.


With that, I am delighted to kick off today’s event which will explore some of the innovative and exciting things this extended community is doing to address climate change. This is really one of the most challenging issues of our time but it is truly bringing out the best and brightest among us to respond.


As I thought about climate change and how far we have come, I thought about Homer’s Iliad, the ancient story of Helen of Troy – whose face launched a thousand ships to bring her back to Greece.


But before those ships could launch, they needed a favorable wind. So they consulted a prophet named Calchas, a man who examined animal entrails and observed the flight of birds to make his prognostications. He told the Greeks they would get their wind if their leader sacrificed his only daughter to the gods.


Back then, that’s what passed for climate science. Today, every Greek warrior would simply pull out a smartphone and check his weather app!


Of course, the Iliad’s a myth, set more than 3,000 years ago. But I use it to show just how far science has come and how technology is literally in our hands, letting us do things previous generations would have considered beyond the power of mere mortals. Most importantly, we are using the great discoveries of biotechnology to address climate change in more effective, sustainable and widely applicable ways.


Last fall, I went to Des Moines, Iowa, to attend the World Food Prize, and to speak about biotechnology as a tool for hunger alleviation and job creation. While there, I had the opportunity to join a farmer in central Iowa, sit in the buddy seat of his John Deere S670 combine harvester, and watch him work.


As we moved through the cornfields, his combine gathered, husked and shelled 12 rows of corn at a time, turning them into bushels of instant grain. He checked his progress with onboard computers and GPS technology. These helped him deposit seed and fertilizer precisely, and even showed if he had missed a single ear of corn!


While he was doing this, he spoke about the importance of international markets for American agriculture, and how he had once hosted President Xi Jinping of China at his farm.


In just one ride on a combine, I saw a farmer using technology to enhance his livelihood and engage fully within the global economy. I also saw how biotechnology was helping farmers to use sustainable techniques that reduce our carbon footprint and address climate change.


Of course, climate change cuts across all sectors of the bioeconomy, which not only include agriculture but health, industry and energy. It is one of the biggest threats of our time with a decisive role in everything from pandemic diseases to crop damage, and from famine to widespread destruction of homes and habitats.


One question for our time is this: Can we direct the kind of innovation that has already built the bioeconomy towards addressing these enormous challenges?


The answer is “yes,” if we continue to build on the incredible innovative progress we have made so far – and are making right now – in the biosciences.


It’s “yes,” as long as we share the same consensus mission: to provide for humanity’s ever growing needs while reducing our carbon footprint.


Finally, it’s “yes,” if we ensure that our breakthroughs not only create benefits for society but are sustainable in the global market.


Right now, in the United States, the bioeconomy is worth more than $300 billion dollars and already supports 1.6 million jobs. It can, and it should, grow more because, quite simply, we have no choice: We have to invent our way to solutions or face the consequences.


The good news is, innovation is central to our DNA. That’s clearly evident in the bioeconomy. We are finding ways to transform our waste into valuable resources. We are making our production processes more efficient and sustainable. Instead of addressing disease with chemically derived medicines that respond to symptoms, we are using biologically derived vaccines that work on the causes. And we are creating sustainable biofuels to drive our cars, warm our homes, and light up our workplaces.


But innovation needs support from many corners, from the funding of research to the protection of intellectual property rights; from a free and open internet to the imaginative partnerships that government and the private sector can create so that more people are free to make those powerful discoveries that benefit us all.


From the government corner, we need to address macro policies that respond to climate change. We need to agree on global commitments that count, metrics that matter, and standards that improve conditions.


The Obama administration has already shown its ongoing commitment in this space. It recently announced a target of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent in 2025 compared with 2005.


Last November, President Obama and President Xi Jinping of China made an historic Joint Announcement of our intended targets, with China agreeing for the first time to a peak year for its CO2 emissions of around 2030 and to an ambitious target of 20 percent clean energy in its energy mix by 2030.


This December in Paris, we are looking to establish, for the first time, an ambitious, durable climate regime that applies to all countries, is fair, and focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building resilience.


Our commitment to address climate change is as widespread as it is focused.


We launched the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture, which works to produce more food, adapt to a changing climate, and reduce greenhouse gases.


We support the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change’s Climate Technology Center and Network, and the Green Climate Fund, both of which support the efforts of developing countries in different ways to adapt to climate change.


That includes work to protect forests, support resilient agricultural sectors, and reduce greenhouse gases, while generating economic opportunities for their citizens.


We also invest billions in research and development of low carbon technologies and energy efficiency.


On other fronts, my Bureau has a leading role in making sure investors, entrepreneurs, researchers and the entire bio-economic extended community can be more connected, integrated, efficient and profitable.


For example, we advocate in world forums for a free internet to keep open channels of information, commerce and trade. We are integral to the negotiations in two ongoing multilateral trade deals that will not only break down barriers to trade and investment but set new environmental standards for member nations.


We also foster innovation by establishing legal frameworks that protect intellectual property rights, minimize corruption, and reward entrepreneurship.


The government has unique assets in at least two other ways. First of all, we have convening authority: We can assemble political leaders, scientists, economists, university leaders, business leaders and multilateral bodies to pursue mutually agreed upon goals.


Secondly, we have 270 embassies and posts around the world – our shoes on the ground, you might say – to extend our messages and outreach with citizens, political leaders and civil society organizations everywhere.


While the U.S. Government works to play its part, there are roles for a wide array of other actors in the bioeconomy, including other governments, multilateral bodies, businesses, universities, entrepreneurs, and scientists.


As I glance around this room, I can see a good representation of that global community. I look forward to hearing more about the stories you have to tell.


We have so much to build on; so many success stories in biotechnology, as we work to combat the effects of climate change. As I mentioned, one of the consequences of climate change is the increased risk of insect-borne disease exposure, such as dengue and malaria, in places such as Florida and Texas. The National Science Foundation has supported research that reengineers microorganisms to produce an anti-malarial drug. It’s called artemisinin and new companies are already putting it on the market.


That’s a perfect illustration of the bioeconomy at its best: Funded innovative research addresses a serious problem, using cross-disciplinary biosciences. The private sector brings it to market and makes it available globally. The problem is addressed.


As I learned on my trip to Iowa, the agricultural sector continues to benefit from innovation. We are making more sustainable use of land and water. We are developing drought tolerant varieties of corn, nutritionally enhanced rice, and disease resistant oranges. These are crucial breakthroughs as we also try to feed a global population that will reach an estimated 9 billion by the year 2050.


These and other stories prove to me that, despite the size and scale of our challenges, we are rising to meet them head on. I believe it’s because, throughout human history, we have made productive use of innovation since we first learned to rub two sticks together.


Back then it was sticks. Now we’re creating genetically modified mosquitos that don’t carry malaria. We are turning algae into jet fuel. We are making apples that don’t brown and potatoes that produce fewer carcinogens when fried.


Of course, with innovation comes change – and inevitably resistance. Charles Kettering, an American inventor and former head of research at General Motors, who owned 186 patents, once said: “The world hates change, yet it is the only thing that has brought progress.”


The bioeconomy is all about progress, from the cellular level to the macro-economic level, as we work to grow an ecosystem of invention and reinvention that creates the products and processes for a more sustainable future. We may not seem as powerful and impressive as those ancient Greek warriors, waiting for their favorable wind. But if you compare the stakes we face, we can make the case that we’re more modern heroes. By creating a viable, sustainable bioeconomy, we are not only enhancing and sustaining society; we are contributing to a more ecologically balanced planet. For my money, that beats getting Helen back from Troy any time!


Thank you.






The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.



Source: Dept. Of State – Releases


    



Collected Department Releases: Keynote Remarks at the Bioeconomy and Climate Change Forum

Weekend Guide: 36 Hours in San Luis Obispo, Calif.

By FREDA MOON


For a refreshing outdoor weekend, head for this coastal stretch of wildflower-strewn hills, beaches, vineyards and open-air cafes.


Source: New York Times


    



Weekend Guide: 36 Hours in San Luis Obispo, Calif.